Oral arguments in the case of Nicholas v. SAWS were heard recently. The Defendant appealed the matter to the Texas Supreme Court after losing before the Fourth Court of Appeals. See my prior post about that appeal here and here. In the oral arguments, the defense attorney, Rachel Ekery, said the harassment by the

Discrimination cases are difficult. They are more difficult than many other types of cases, because there is an intrinsic bias against discrimination claimants. As Judge Kopf (of Hercules and the Umpire blog) said, many judges are simply skeptical about discrimination claims. We see some of the challenges in this article about successful discrimination and retaliation

The ADA Amendments Act was passed in 2009. Since then, courts have addressed more fundamental questions about disability claims, such as what are the essential functions of a job and how can they be accommodated? On one such case, Perez v. Sprint/United Management Co., 2013 WL 6970898, No. 12-CV-3161 (N.D. Ga 12/19/2013), the court

Usually at settlement times, clients ask me about our chances for success at trial.  What might happen at trial drives everything in a lawsuit, especially settlement.  But, predicting 6 to 12 of our fellow citizens is more art than science. Jury dynamics are often mysterious. There are so many variables in jury deliberations that that

A Bexar County jury has awarded a former police officer $1.28 million.  Tomas Padilla was a police officer for the University Health System.  He was terminated in 2009 shortly after complaining that the officer he had replaced was trying to recruit patients and visitors to the hospital to make false claims about Officer Padilla.  Officer

Juries do the craziest things, sometimes.  In a trial a few years ago in the Rio Grande Valley, a jury returned a verdict following several days of testimony.  The verdict said yes, the employer violated anti-discrimination laws.  But, the jury said no, the employee did not suffer any lost pay or compensatory damages (emotional suffering).

Many of my discrimination clients go into settlement talks with the expectation they will receive enough in settlement to retire.  No, not hardly.  Most cases settle for less than $30,000.  Settlement discussions are supposed to reflect the reality of jury verdicts.  And, the reality of jury verdicts is that even when the plaintiff employee wins