Electronic monitoring in the workplace is still an area of developing law. It is clear that an employer cannot use bugging devices and phone wiretaps to discourage or monitor union activity. It is also clear that no one, including employers, can intercept “wire, oral, or electronic communication.” But, what is “intercept”? What does that
Worker Loses Job over Obscenity in Email
School employee loses job because he sent an email containing a one word obscenity to a blog. See ABA article. When the employee was confronted with the email, he resigned. Another example of someone who publishes something controversial on the internet under the mistaken belief no one will ever see it.
Employee’s Emails *Might* be Protected
Personal emails at work are sometimes protected from intrusion and sometimes not. The email system belongs to the employer. One indicator that work generated emails may be protected occurs when the employer allows some personal use of email. See the case discussed at one blog post. But, see another case discussed at a different…
Passwords to a Personal Email Account are Protected
In a recent decision, a federal court in California found it unlawful for an employer to monitor an employee’s key strokes in order to obtain his password to a personal email account. The U.S. district court found this action violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, passed in 1986. The decision, Brahmana v. Lembo…