Facebook Becoming Essential to an Employment Lawsuit

The first thing one defense lawyer does when he is hired for an employment case is check the employee's Facebook account.  See blog post.  Eric Meyer, a defense lawyer, looks for references to the work place or the employer.  He prints out any pictures.  He looks for any information that refutes or refers to any allegation in the lawsuit or complaint.  According to one case, EEOC v. Simply Storage Management, it does not matter whether the employee has opted for privacy or not.  An employer would still have the right to request such information as part of the discovery process. 

Mr. Meyer does not mention that Simply Storage concerned two female plaintiffs who claimed post-traumatic stress disorder.  See my prior post on that case.  So, Simply Storage should not apply to the vast majority of cases in which the plaintiff seeks nothing more than "garden variety emotional distress."  But, the case does suggest that FB entries will be discoverable in some cases. 

Mr. Meyer says he will issue a subpoena if necessary.  He will send a spoliation letter - meaning a letter which warns the employee from deleting anything on FB until the defense can obtain copies. The defense lawyer even says he will review the friends' list to see who might have access to your FB website.  He appears to suggest he would consider asking current employees to access your FB wall and report what they find. 

There was a time when the employer had in its possession all the relevant evidence.  Now, the employee may have some critical evidence, as well.  That does place some responsibility upon the plaintiff employee to safeguard potential evidence. 

Judge Orders Facebook Updates to be Produced

In a recent decision, a federal court in Southern indiana ordered two plaintiffs to turn over their Facebook entries, wall postings, photos, groups joined, etc.  See report.  Mike Maslanka reports that the EEOC filed suit alleging sex harassment on behalf of two women.   See EEOC v. Simply Storage Management, LLC.  The Court ordered the women to produce the Facebook updates, wall postings, groups joined, etc. that related to their emotional status.  As the court noted, any posting by the two women is capable of leading to admissible evidence regarding their emotional state for the time period in which they claim severe emotional distress.   The court limits its order to this particular case in which the two women claim post-traumatic stress disorder.  The women do not claim "garden variety" emotional distress.  

The ruling is in keeping with prior decisions that do allow for great discovery when victims claim severe emotional suffering.  The new aspect is that the judge orders production of password protected or "friend protected"  information.  

As I have had to explain to a few clients, when you file suit, you do give up some privacy rights.....