Judge Prohibits Debt Collector from Contacting Facebook Friends

You know its bad when a judge orders a debt collector not to contact a debtor, her friends or family on Facebook.  Melanie Meacham filed suit over MarkOne Financial's debt collection practices in Pinellas County District Court - near Orlando, Florida.  See ABA Bar Journal report.  MarkOne declined to respond, but stated last year apparently when the lawsuit first started that it resorts to Facebook only when conventional means of contacting a debtor have failed.  You know they must have contacted a bunch of folks before a judge orders them to stop.....

PI Law Firm Offers iPad to Facebook Friends

 A Dallas personal injury firm has seized on the social media revolution to market its Facebook page.  Eberstein and Witherite offered iPad's to a lucky few and t-shirts if the participants would "like" its Facebook page and submit photos of themselves wearing its 1800 Car Wreck t-shirts.  See Texas Lawyer report.  Clicking on the link to win the iPad takes the participant to the firm website.  The site has a page where the "likers" can describe their recent car wreck and learn the value of a possible case.  

As of early April 14, they had 463 Facebook "like's."  You gotta love the internet....

EEOC Files Suit Against Construction Firm

 The EEOC has filed suit against an oil rig construction company doing business in Texas and Mississippi.  The EEOC filed suit against Signal International LLC in Gulfport, Mississippi on behalf of indian workers recruited for US work on an H-2B visa.  The workers were recruited to come here to work as welders and pipefitters in Pascagoula, Mississippi and Orange, Texas.  Signal says they needed the workers in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina when workers were scarce.  See San Antonio Express News report.  The workers came here from 2006 through 2007.  The suit seeks class certification. 

The suit claims discrimination based on ethnic origin and retaliation.  Some of the workers began seeing lawyers in 2007 regarding their conditions.  They were subjected to harsh language, unsanitary living conditions.  Their living area was surrounded by a fence and the immigrants were sometimes searched before entering.  In response to the workers seeing lawyers, Signal rounded up five workers and sent them home to India.  

I presume the "harsh" language refers to racial epithets.  Otherwise, such language would not be relevant to a lawsuit based on discrimination and retaliation. 

Some workers filed suit in 2008 alleging human trafficking and racketeering.  Assisted by the Southern Povery Law Center, that earlier suit is still pending. 

As always, discrimination lawsuits can be problematic.  But, retaliation suits are much easier for the worker to win.  Employers should not take reprisal for workers seeking their rights under Title VII.  That only makes the situation worse. 

Hondo, Texas Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

 A former Hondo, Texas resident was killed in Afghanistan.  Assigned to the 10th Mountain Division, SPC Charles "Chaz" J. Wren was killed in Nimroz Province in southwestern Afghanistan.  SPC Wren spent most of his life in Hondo and graduated from Hondo High School in 2004.  He was known at Hondo High for wearing a cape to pep rallies and getting the crowd excited.  See San Antonio Express News report

He was killed along with two other soldiers by an IED (Improvised Explosive Device).  SPC Wren lead a difficult life.  Orphaned early, he was raised by his grandmother.  He was known for his sense of humor. 

TWC Undermines Employee Claims

Texas Workforce Commission appears almost designed to undermine legitiimate employee claims for unemployment benefits.  I receive one or two calls every year from recipients of unemployment benefits who were overpaid unemployment benefits through TWC errors and now, TWC wants their money back.  TWC essentially tells them to pay it back or else.  

One young man called me from out of state saying he did disclose his part-time job.  TWC continued to pay him benefits.  Then, after many months, they realized their error and threatened him with suit if he did re-pay some $7,500 in overpaid benefits.  I had to explain to him that it would cost him close to $7,500 to pay me to represent him regarding this error. 

More, recently, I heard from a woman who was paid some $14,000 in benefits erroneously, but not erroneously.  That is, when she was hired for a job, she signed an agreement saying she would not apply for unemployment benefits if she was ever fired.  Well, she was fired after a few years.  She applied for unemployment benefits and received them.  TWC later found she was not entitled to benefits.  They accused her of fraud and demanded she re-pay the benefits.  She eventually had a telephone hearing and this time, TWC found the employer at fault.  So, the fired employee should receive unemployment benefits, after all. 

So, now she is eligible for benefits.  But, TWC will not pay her benefits unless she first re-pays the $14,000.  Of course, she is unemployed and does not have an extra $14,000.  Talk about Catch-22.  To get benefits, she must first re-pay the benefits to which she was entitled, after all.  Makes my head spin....

I helped a lady with an unemployment claim appeal last year.  She was required to call in each week to "register" for benefits.  If she did not call in, she would not receive benefits that week.  She called into TWC over and over for two weeks and could never get through.  The line was always busy.  Since she could never get through, she was never able to collect unemployment for those two weeks.  She appealed.  She testified that she could never get through.  There was no testimony to the contrary.  But, the TWC judge ruled against her on that one issue. 

The lady with the $14,000 issue had the same experience.  She tried to get advice from TWC regarding this issue in December and January and never could get past the busy signal.  She finally reached someone in February. 

I previously wrote about the appeals division at TWC.  I talked about the head of the appeals division at TWC advising employers on how to "game the system."  The head of the appeals division told employers at a conference that they could avoid unemployment claims through subterfuge.  See prior post.  So, yes, it almost appears that TWC is a system designed to avoid paying valid claims for unemployment benefits.  Same old, same old.....

 

Texas Bar Assoc. Fires Lawyer Soon After Disclosing Illness

 A former employee has sued the State Bar of Texas alleging discrimination based on his disability.  The former employee was a lawyer for some 15 years with the State bar.  He claims he suffered no problems at work until he disclosed that he suffered from Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome, the foot equivalent of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, and other related illnesses.  Montgomery Miller says he was fired in September, 2010, two weeks after disclosing his illness.  

Without knowing more, yes, this does sound like a good case for the employee plaintiff.  The Bar better have some good write-ups showing performance issues.  Termination within weeks of disclosure puts the employer in a very bad position for a lawsuit.  Not many juries will believe that a 15 year employee suddenly started performing poorly immediately after disclosing an illness. 

Employee Fired for His Honesty Loses Appeal

The employee of an Illinois law firm was fired when he refused to cooperate in issuing fraudulent bills to clients.  The law firm claimed the hours performed by an in-hpuse employee were actually performed by an outside investigator.  The firm then billed at the higher rates used by outside investigators.  One of the in-house investigators, however, refused to cooperate in altering his invoice to reflect the higher rates.  He was then fired.  See Workplace Prof report.  

An Illinois appellate court ruled that the firing did not violate any public policy in that state.  Sad to say, but the same result would probably obtain in Texas.  There is no law in Texas protecting an employee from reprisal for simply being honest.  There is no law protecting a private sector employee from reprisal for even reporting violations of law by their employer.  In Texas, this lawsuit would not be a whistle blower lawsuit since the employee did not report violations of law to a law enforcement agency. 

The law firm, Karlin & Fleisher, will surely suffer from bad publicity.  But, how many more Karlin and Fleishers are there out there who do not get sued?  

Dallas Law Firm Sued for Discrimination

Two former employees of Dallas law firm Simon, Eddins & Greenstone have filed suit against the firm alleging sex based discriminatioon.  The women filed in federal court according to an April 11 report in Texas Lawyer.

In Franklin v. Simon, Eddins & Greenstone, Katherine Franklin alleges an associate lawyer, Ben Braly, sent her a link via email in November, 2009.  The link allegedly included a picture of partner Greenstone's penis.  Ms. Franklin contacted the EEOC.  She provided info to the EEOC in preparation for filing a charge.  She reported the pornography to Partner Simon, she alleges.  

She met with a lawyer outside the firm who said he was related to Simon and could not represent her.  The firm then fired her the next day in December, 2009. 

The firm claims Ms. Franklin was fired after she received a poor review.  Franklin says she had received good reviews before that and had received a $500 bonus.  Ms. Franklin says Mr. Greenstone showed her the email and told her she did not have to open it - apparently suggesting it was her choice to click on the link. 

In an interview, Mr. Greenstone says in November, 2009, he changed the screen saver on the associate's phone to something "inappropriate."  Ben Braly, the associate lawyer, then tried to respond by sending a mock Human Resources complaint about Greenstone to another lawyer.  But, Mr. Braly inadvertently sent the prank email to Franklin.  The prank email contained a link to a video of two men.  Mr. Greenstone says Mr. Braly apologized immediately to Franklin.  He says no one saw the inappropriate image other than Mr. Braly.  

Mr. Greenstone emphasizes that he never intended to offend anyone.  There are things they do in the office for fun.  And, they want everyone to be treated with respect, he added.  

The firm denies the picture of the penis was Mr. Greenstone's.  The Plaintiffs' lawyer says he does not know if is or is not, because he has never seen Mr. Greenstone's penis.  In a Title VII analysis, I think it matters little to whom the penis belonged....  

The firm may have some good facts with which to minimize the sex harassment portion of the case.  But, retaliation is always the stronger claim.  The retaliation claim plus the "frat boy" atmosphere puts the law firm in a bad position. 

Proposed Bill Seeks to Prevent Lawsuit with More Lawsuits

 Barratry is generally defined as a lawyer illicitly seeking clients.  A lawyer cannot solicit clients directly.  So, one state legislator has decided the best way to avoid barratry is to allow more lawsuits.    Sen. Robert Duncan, R-Lubbock, has proposed a bill in the Texas legislature that would allow civil lawsuits against persons (ie, lawyers) who commit the offense of barratry.  See Texas Lawyer report. 

Under the terms of his proposed bill, a victim of barratry could sue the offending lawyer and collect attorney's fees, costs of the new lawsuit and $10,000 as a civil penalty.  The current offense of barratry only applies to personal injury lawsuits.  But, the proposed bill would widen the offense to all lawsuits. 

Bexar Met Fires 18 Employees

I believe you can often discern the better places to work just by walking in the front door.  If employees are willing to chat with a visitor or assist with questions beyond their normal area of expertise, that is probably a positive working environment.  Such a workplace has high morale.  But, if the workers are resistant or guarded in their responses, then that work place probably has low morale.  What happens when some 23 employees take a test and 18 of those 23 cheat on the test?  What does that say about that particular working environment?

23 Bexar Metropolitan Water District took a required test for a Class C water distribution system operator license.  The test is administered by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.  It is a standard test for for large municipal water systems.  Achieving the Class C certification means the employee understands how to work on water lines without contaminating the water system.  See San Antonio Express News report.  TCEQ investigated possible cheating and found some test-takers had the answers to a recent test.  

TCEQ decided to void all the tests.  Everyone must re-take that test.  Bexar Met fired 18 employees for involvement in this cheating scandal.  

Bexar Met continues to have many problems.  

Texas Law Firm Sues Former Paralegal for Online Defamation

 A Houston law firm has sued a former paralegal claiming she and her husband defamed the law firm.  The law firm, Weston & Associates, claims Amber Williams went to a Citysearch website and left a negative review of the firm.  The suit claims the firm fired Ms. Williams for insubordination in 2010. She was fired after less than a month on the job. See ABA Bar Journal report.  

Unemployment Dips Below 9%

The national unemployment rate has dipped below 9%.  It now stands at 8.8%.  See Workplace Prof report.  This decrease represents a trend of continued, slight improvement over several months.  There still remains many long-term unemployed workers.  Unemployment benefit claims have dropped.  So, we are experiencing slight improvement for a few months, now. 

Afghans Riot over Quran Burning

 So, Rev. Terry Jones finally did burn a Quran at his Florida church just a couple of weeks ago.  Now, Afghanistan is rioting and has killed several United Nations workers - only because this particular mob could not find any Americans handy.  Reports are that the Afghans will attack US bases.  No kidding.  I wish I could say this was a surprise.  Afghans rioted when the Danish newspaper published a cartoon about Mohammed.  They rioted when it was reported that soldiers at Guantanamo flushed a Quran down the toilet.  

When I was in Iraq, we knew there would be a spike in violence simply when issues over Israel developed.  GEN Petraeus specifically asked Pastor Jones to not burn the Quran.  It is unfortunate that some US citizens have forgotten about our soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq and have knowingly taken steps which increase their risk.  Pastor Jones has displayed his irresponsibility and callousness toward out service members